It's Not The Refugee's Fault And Is this Really In The Constitution?

Here's a truth about the refugees not being able to come to America.... America has and will always want to help refugees. The unfortunate circumstance that we are found in right now is that evil people have been posing as refugees to get into countries where they then commit terrorist acts. The poor helpless refugees have gotten caught in the middle of that situation and that is why we are having to be so tough on who gets to enter the United States. This will not last forever, but it is important to get a handle on who is coming into our country so that we have a better chance of protecting ourselves.

Many have talked about how this Muslim ban is not constitutional which to me just doesn't make sense. Bottom line it's not about the constitution it's about discrediting Trump. Non-the-less I took a look at the permeable of the constitution just to see if it was written for the reason of protection us.

Guess what.... it was! From the preamble of the constitution... which say OUR, not the world, We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

So when I shared this with someone who takes the stance not it's not constitutional to keep people from coming to America not only was I shocked by that response I was told that the permeable says nothing about protecting us. I'm not sure how much more clear the words could be that state that the intention of the constitution was written for OUR, not the worlds, safety

Here is my take on it's meaning ..... We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union ..... that speaks to safety, being in danger of being killed is not being unified, establish Justice .... is it Justice for people wtho want to do harm and change everything about our lives? It you think that then when you or your family is killed then you can't complain about it, insure domestic Tranquility...... doesn't this mean that the government was peace in our homes? provide for the common defence....... this means that everyone will be defended promote the general Welfare,....... doesn't welfare mean how you are doing, as in your fare, day to day living is fare and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves....... doesn't this blessing of liberty mean freedom to worship and live and speak out and do whatever we want with out the threat of being killed for it and our Posterity,...... is not so that our families can live on in a way that we teach them or they decide to believe with you being killed and stopping the next generations to be born? do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

How is this not speaking to our protection?

Those that people say people were blocked from re-entry into the US that had property here, or a green card, is false. They were detained long enough to make sure the person was who they said they were and if they were refused re-entry then that means there were enough question about them to not let them back in. What is wrong with that?

I have traveled and lived outside of the US and when I have come back home I was not let in until it was proven that I was who I said I was. The process didn't take as long because there was not super long lines like there are now.

I suggest that those who have not been giving permission yet to re-turn and you are concerned about that then maybe you could invite those individuals to come and stay in your home.

I'm not trying to be ugly or a smartie about these things but just thinking it through the thought of letting people into our country who pose a threat, in any way, is not a smart idea to let them come here.. It's true that someone could pass all the markers of getting in and then cause a problem once they are here and by the way, that is the main concern about letting refugees in because bad people pose as refugees to get easy access to us.

I also don't understand why no one raised a stink about this when every president who has upheld a ban on certain people coming into America from certain places has done nothing different than Trump has done. I can tell you why there was no stink about it, that's because the main stream media didn't report it or if they did it was a quick blurb about it and so no one knew so therefore no stink was raised.

If you would have known about the other presidents that have done the exact same action as Trump did would have protested it? 

Six times Muslims have been banned from coming into America

http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2017/01/times-banned-immigrants-170128183528941.html

Now that you have proof of other Presidents doing the same thing as Trump is doing regarding Muslims, are you going to protest against those presidents? Many of them are still alive and they will here you. If you are not willing to do so then that show that we are not truly vetted in helping Muslims but rather you are just waning to discredit Trump because you don't like him.

It's an honest question. Why now, why be upset about it now, is it because you don't like Trump, or is it because it is a just something that caught your attention because everyone was talking about it?